Legal disclaimer

The opinions expressed by the authors on this blog and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of the Freedom2Choose organisation or any member thereof. Freedom2Choose is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the blog Authors.

Thursday, 12 November 2009

Careful what you wish for, USA

As the USA scrambles to replicate the car crash that is our state-controlled health service, here is a sober warning that they should be watchful of the potential returns.

A plumber whose arm was left twisted grotesquely out of shape in an accident ten months ago has had an operation to correct it 'cancelled four times'.

Nick Carver, the chief executive of the East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, insisted computer records showed the trust had only cancelled two operations and that proceeding with the operations could have put Mr Eeles's life at risk.

'The first time was back in February when his blood pressure was found to be high.

'As his surgery was not an emergency, our surgeons took the right action in referring Mr Eeles to his GP so his blood pressure could be brought under control.

'His second operation in May 2009 was also cancelled, this time because he had failed to act on our surgeon's advice that Mr Eeles that he should give up smoking.

'In cancelling Mr Eeles' two operation dates, our surgeons were acting on clinical grounds only.

'If they are guilty of anything, then it is of having the best clinical interests of their patients at heart.'

This isn't the first time this has happened within our wonderful NHS, either.

A man with a broken ankle is facing a lifetime of pain because a Health Service hospital has refused to treat him unless he gives up smoking.

John Nuttall, 57, needs surgery to set the ankle which he broke in three places two years ago because it did not mend naturally with a plaster cast.

Doctors at the Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro have refused to operate because they say his heavy smoking would reduce the chance of healing, and there is a risk of complications which could lead to amputation.

Wouldn't it be helpful if we knew how this sort of thing would be handled under the current American healthcare system. Oh, here you go, an anti-smoking US doctor can tell us.

This is disgusting. There are no valid clinical grounds to deny a patient surgery to repair a severely broken bone on the basis of his being a smoker. All this amounts to is the surgeons and health trust punishing this poor man for failing to follow their advice. But you don't punish someone by denying them a necessary surgery. If we punished all patients who fail to heed their doctor's advice in this way, we would perform almost no surgeries.

While I'm not familiar with clinical treatment in Great Britain, I am quite familiar with surgery for broken bones in the United States, and I have never seen a patient refused surgery to repair a severely broken bone because he or she smokes. In fact, to delay the surgery for that reason would likely put the surgeon at risk for a malpractice suit, because the longer you wait to repair the broken bones, the more damage that is done and the more difficult it becomes to do the repair successfully.

In my view, this represents medical malpractice.

But then, once the state takes over healthcare and mixes it with the politics, prejudices, and bigotry of the day, these things will happen.

I've been to the US a couple of times, and they seem to be quite large on the whole. Once Obamacare is all bedded in and fat people begin to be turned away from health centres, there could be some seriously pissed off yanks.

Still, it's their choice I suppose. Who are we to warn them?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

You guys may also like to have a peep at this website. It is full of blunders by the NHS. I am also aware that there will be devastating critique of the NHS coming out soon.

I have repect of the NHS from 10 years ago but now is a bureaucratic shambles and in need of reform.

Dave Atherton

http://nationaldeathservice.blogspot.com/

TheBigYin said...

On our blogroll I try to have a mixture of views, views that I may not believe in myself but I must face and hear the other side of the argument. One such person who I value for his opinions is Alan Caruba, an American that baulks at President O'Barmy's grand design to turn the US against it's constitution (do you recognise a theme here?)

He may be a conservative of the 'right wing' but he makes a lot of sense.

See Alan's blog here: http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/

Dick Puddlecote said...

Funny enough, I've heard of that blog, Dave Atherton. ;-)

Anonymous said...

If only people in the States knew what was happening here, they would have all the evidence they need to convince anyone sitting on the fencepost over US nationalized healthcare why not to do it or else suffer the consequences, not just in quality and quantity of healthcare per-se but in loss of freedom and liberty in all related aspects.

However an association can be drawn by words, so a nationalized healthcare can be made to affect whatever liberty, freedom, choice and class of citizen out of favor with the ruling political class to be denied, rationed and restricted and it can be justified and made to stick in the compliant media as the words draw back to that of "health", thus "unarguable" once institutionalized.

opinions powered by SendLove.to

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Pages on this blog